Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

LOCAL NEWS

Kespa Chabata ZIMRA Officer in Court For Extorting US$1,900 From Trucker

A Zimbabwe Revenue Authority (ZIMRA) officer Kespa Chabata has been brought before the courts on allegations of soliciting and accepting a bribe amounting to US$1,900 from a truck driver whom he apprehended for smuggling fuel.

Kespa Chabata, aged 57, appeared before Harare magistrate Stanford Mambanje facing charges of criminal abuse of office. He was granted bail set at US$200.

The accusations against Chabata stem from an incident on March 9, during which he purportedly demanded a bribe of US$3,000 to refrain from seizing a truck found transporting incorrect cargo.

According to prosecutors, Chabata allegedly extorted the money from Given Alcapony Nhamo, the driver of a fuel tanker parked at Zindoga truck stop in Waterfalls, Harare.

Reportedly, Chabata, who was on night duty, noticed the truck during his commute home. Upon inspecting the truck’s importation documents, he discovered a discrepancy between the declared cargo (Butanone) and the actual cargo (diesel).

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

ALSO READ: Bezbets gaming convicted after refusing to pay punter

Instead of following proper procedure by informing ZIMRA authorities or his supervisors, Chabata purportedly demanded US$3,000 from the driver to overlook the irregularity and avoid confiscating the truck.

The driver, in turn, contacted Lennon Chenga, who was identified as the person in charge. Chabata instructed the driver to have Chenga bring the money to the scene.

Subsequently, Kessie, a supervisor at Dinotic Energy in Sandton, South Africa, who had authorized the diesel transport, managed to gather US$1,900, which was delivered to Chabata.

After receiving the bribe, Chabata returned the truck’s documents, alleging that the importation documents were fraudulent. However, he refrained from seizing the truck, allowing Nhamo to depart despite being aware of the offense.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The prosecution contends that Chabata’s actions demonstrated undue favoritism towards the trucker, as he neglected to take the appropriate step of seizing the truck.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Catch More Updates Below

Advertisement